reduce their wages. Mr. Goyal’s legal team contended that use of the logo was protected as a nominative fair use of the trademark under Section 30(1)(a) and (b) of the aforesaid Act. Sakal Media Group’s lawyers argued that Mr. Goyal had no right to claim any such protection because the use of the registered trade mark of Sakal Media Group prominently in the said articles unfairly projected the media house, thereby causing loss to its image and finances. The High Court, in its ruling held that the FIR could not have been registered due to absence of ingredients after proper interpretation of Section 101,102 and 103 as the mark being shown in the articles cannot be said to be in the context of either ‘goods’ or ‘services’ as defined under Section 2(j) and 2(z) of the